USPTO serial 76446701
F FIFE M A MAXCESS INTERNATIONAL COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with F FIFE M A MAXCESS INTERNATIONAL COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oklahoma City, OK
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WEB GUIDING EQUIPMENT-NAMELY, AIR PRESSURE HYDRAULIC POWER UNITS, PHOTOELECTRIC HYDRAULIC POWER UNITS, AIR FLOW SENSING HEADS, AIR FEELER SENSING HEADS, PHOTOELECTRIC SENSING HEADS, REMOTE SENSING HEAD POSITIONING ASSEMBLIES, INTERMEDIATE GUIDING DEVICES, OFFSET PIVOTING GUIDE ROLLERS, SHIFTA-ROLL STANDS, CENTER GUIDING SYSTEMS, AUTOMATIC WIDTH RECORDERS, MULTIPLE INTERMEDIATE GUIDING ASSEMBLIES, SENSING HEAD OSCILLATORS AND CHILL ROLL INTERMEDIATE GUIDING DEVICES | ACTIVE | Oct 20, 2001 |
| 026 | WEB GUIDING EQUIPMENT-NAMELY, AIR PRESSURE HYDRAULIC POWER UNITS, PHOTOELECTRIC HYDRAULIC POWER UNITS, AIR FLOW SENSING HEADS, AIR FEELER SENSING HEADS, PHOTOELECTRIC SENSING HEADS, REMOTE SENSING HEAD POSITIONING ASSEMBLIES, INTERMEDIATE GUIDING DEVICES, OFFSET PIVOTING GUIDE ROLLERS, SHIFTA-ROLL STANDS, CENTER GUIDING SYSTEMS, AUTOMATIC WIDTH RECORDERS, MULTIPLE INTERMEDIATE GUIDING ASSEMBLIES, SENSING HEAD OSCILLATORS AND CHILL ROLL INTERMEDIATE GUIDING DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |