USPTO serial 76446717
WALK STRONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WALK STRONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Kirsch
JONATHAN KIRSCH LAW OFFICES OF JONATHAN KIRSCH1880 CENTURY PARK E STE 515LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMINS AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GT MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GT MERCHANDISING & LICENSING CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by GT MERCHANDISING & LICENSING CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named WALK STRONG
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |