Drawing for OLSEN

USPTO serial 76446875

OLSEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3390498Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 4, 2008
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with OLSEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. Cheslek

Brian R. Cheslek Price Heneveld LLP3400 Innovation Court SEPO Box 2567Grand Rapids, MI 49501-2567

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010House mark for electrosurgical medical instruments; electrosurgical cable; for medical accessories, namely switch pens, electrodes, adapters, speculums, suction tubes and forcepsACTIVEDec 31, 1973

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2025ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 7, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 2, 2024EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Feb 2, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 2, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2023ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 21, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 12, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 12, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 12, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 30, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 18, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 29, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 20, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 4, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 30, 2008DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Jun 14, 2007IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jun 14, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 12, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 3, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 3, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 20, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 11, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 20, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance