Drawing for ARTEC

USPTO serial 76447066

ARTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Helen M. O'Shaughnessy

HELEN M O'SHAUGHNESSY2 E 52ND STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Cuff-links, rings, bracelets, earrings, necklaces, brooches; watches, chronometers, clocksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 17, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 17, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 20, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 20, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 19, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2007CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 16, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 16, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 4, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 2, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 8, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 8, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 20, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance