USPTO serial 76447438
GOURMET'S CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOURMET'S CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell, Esq.
LESLIE K. MITCHELL, ESQ. FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Shelf support posts, shelf post clamps, post leveling feet, shelf joining clamps, shelf wall mounts, coat hanger tubes and brackets, shelf brackets, corer braces, shelf spacers, shelf dividers, shelf slides, casters, all made primarily of metal | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | Non-motorized food service carts, dollies, mobile dish dollies and carts, non-motorized industrial housekeepers' carts | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Shelving systems comprised of shelves, platforms, shelf ledges, shelf inlays, utility baskets for the handling and storage of general articles, catheter baskets, tote boxes, plastic bin markers, work counters, commercial work stations, plastic bumpers and waste containers for commercial use; delivery and storage cabinets and wire security mobile and stationary cabinet; dunnage racks | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | Metal and plastic trays and racks and inserts therefor used for storing and transporting cups, dishes, glassware, silverware, trays and table and kitchen utensils and for supporting them while being passed through a dish washing machine, spice racks, wine racks and wine shelves, tray racks; cooking utensils, namely, wire baskets | ABANDONED | — |
| 022 | Unfitted sheet plastic covers for shelving systems and mobile carts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Metro Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Metro Industries, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named GOURMET'S CHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 15, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |