USPTO serial 76447583
SUNFIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNFIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SURREY, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN N JENNISON
JOHN N JENNISON JENNISON & SHULTZ PC2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 1102ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PRE-PACKAGED VITAMINS, MINERALS, HERBS AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENT SOLD IN RAW, POWDERED, DRY, TABLET, LIQUID AND TINCTURE FORMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |