Drawing for MUNCHKIN

USPTO serial 76447592

MUNCHKIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUNCHKIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet A. Kobrin, Esq.

JANET A KOBRIN ESQ WARNER BROS4000 WARNER BLVDBURBANK, CA 91522UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024textile wall hangings featuring fictional characters and/or elements from the 1939 motion picture classic in which a little girl and her dog are transported from a Midwestern state by a tornado to an imaginary place whose populace includes persons known by the term sought to be registered herein, in which a song is sung featuring reference to being somewhere over a colorful meteorological phenomenonACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 6, 2014EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 20, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 17, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2013NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 24, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 29, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 21, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 8, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 8, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 25, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 25, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 20, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 6, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 3, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 10, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 27, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance