USPTO serial 76447740
MALLESONS STEPHEN JAQUES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2005
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MALLESONS STEPHEN JAQUES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sydney NSW, AU
New South Wales 2000, AU
New South Wales 2000, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Cady
James R. Cady Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP2475 Hanover StreetPalo Alto, CA 94304-1114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | [ Business management consultation; legal administration and legal support services, namely, providing legal management services for others; business consultation regarding business development, technology, commercialization, technology exploitation and marketing; tax advisory and consulting services, namely, tax consultation and preparation ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1987 |
| 036 | [ Legal risk management services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1987 |
| 041 | [ Training services in the field of law and legal compliance, business, taxation and regulatory matters; education and training services, namely, providing classes, seminars, conferences, symposiums and workshops in the field of law and legal compliance, business, taxation and regulatory matters; publication of magazine articles, journals, periodicals, text books and books pertaining to law and legal compliance, business, taxation and regulatory matters ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1987 |
| 042 | Legal services;[ reviewing standards and practices to assure compliance with laws and regulations; legal services in the form of litigation services; legal services in the form of dispute management; providing databases featuring information on legal services, legislation and legal case law; arbitration and dispute resolution services; technology management consultancy and advisory services, namely, development of new technology for others in the field of law and legal compliance; intellectual property services, namely, providing legal services in the field of patents, trademarks and design; computer project management services; public document retrieval ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mallesons Stephen Jaques
- Other trademarks owned by Mallesons Stephen Jaques
- Other trademarks owned by Mallesons Stephen Jaques
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MALLESONS STEPHEN JAQUES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |