USPTO serial 76447832
PANDA FARMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2004
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PANDA FARMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANDS POINT, NY
SANDS POINT, NY
GOSHEN, NY
GOSHEN, NY
GOSHEN, NY
GOSHEN, NY
GOSHEN, NY
GOSHEN, NY
Miami, FL
MIAMI, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES B. RODMAN
CHARLES B. RODMAN RODMAN & RODMANSUITE 2CE10 STEWART PLACEWHITE PLAINS, NY 10603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | [ Fresh sprouts, namely, alfalfa, radish, bean, soybean, sunflower, clover, lentil, Garbanzo and pinto beans; ] fresh vegetables, namely, onions, Belgian endive, shallots, [ snow peas, ] and pearl onions; and fresh ginger root | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRECES, EDDY
- Other trademarks owned by CRECES, EDDY
- Other trademarks owned by CRECES, MIREILLE
- Other trademarks owned by CRECES, MIREILLE
- Other trademarks owned by CRECES, HENRI
- Other trademarks owned by CRECES, HENRI
- Other trademarks owned by CRECES, HENRI
- Other trademarks owned by CRECES, HENRI
- Other trademarks owned by COOSEMANS, DANNY
- Other trademarks owned by COOSEMANS, DANNY
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named PANDA FARMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2025 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 25, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 25, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 18, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |