Drawing for STOPSHOCK

USPTO serial 76447850

STOPSHOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STOPSHOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian M. Dingman

BRIAN M DINGMAN MIRICK O'CONNELL DEMALLIE & LOUGEE LLP1700 W PARK DRWESTBOROUGH, MA 01581-3941UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal anti-static auxiliary attachments to key holders, namely, key rings, key chains, key fobs and key tagsACTIVE—
009Handheld electrostatic charge dissipaters; conductive fibers, namely, fibers for conducting electrical charges and static electrical charges; anti-static stripsACTIVE—
020Non-metal anti-static auxiliary attachments to key holders, namely, key rings, key chains, key fobs and key tagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 5, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 4, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 11, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance