USPTO serial 76448265
TORTUGA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TORTUGA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nova Prata - Rio Grande do Sul, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NILS H. LJUNGMAN, ESQ.
NILS H LJUNGMAN ESQ NILS H LJUNGMAN & ASSOCIATESP O BOX 130GREENSBURG, PA 15601-0130UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Vulcanizing glue for industrial purposes; vulcanized contact cements, tire tube repair kit comprised of tire patches, adhesive sealant, glue, tube plates and vulcanized fluids to vulcanize patches so they can be applied to the tubes to make the patches stick to and seal the tubes, sold as a unit; tire tube repair kit for vulcanizing tire patches; tire tube repair kit for vulcanizing adhesive sealant; tire tube repair kit for vulcanizing glue; tire tube repair kit for vulcanizing tube plates; tire tube repair kit for vulcanizing fluids | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Vulcanized rubber for use as tire or tube patches in patch casings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |