Drawing for NEUROS HD

USPTO serial 76448416

NEUROS HD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEUROS HD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Gray IV

ANDREW J GRAY IV PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP3300 HILLVIEW AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PLAYERS AND RECORDERS OF DIGITAL AUDIO EMBODIED IN ELECTRONIC FILE FORMAT; RADIOS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATING, MANAGING, PLAYING, AND RECORDING DIGITAL AUDIOACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 8, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance