USPTO serial 76448825
STING-B-GONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- PRE-PUBLICATION FINAL REVIEW
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STING-B-GONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fort Wright, KY
Fort Wright, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia B. Hogan
PATRICIA B HOGAN EETKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP PLL1400 PROVIDENT TWR ONE E 4TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Herbal preparation for the relief of insect bites | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |