Drawing for EDDIE RODRIGUEZ

USPTO serial 76449497

EDDIE RODRIGUEZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EDDIE RODRIGUEZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Brooke, Esq.

THOMAS W BROOKE ESQ HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020FurnitureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 13, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 13, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 28, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 28, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 23, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance