USPTO serial 76449597
IPHARMACIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPHARMACIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Weston, Ontario, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla C. Calcagno
Carla C. Calcagno HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPSUITE 1002099 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded video tapes featuring training in the use of personal digital assistants preprogrammed with pharmaceutical information and handheld personal digital assistant computers preprogrammed with computer database software containing pharmacy and pharmaceutical-related proprietary and publicly available information, both of which are intended for use by pharmacists and pharmacy technicians in the practice of pharmacy | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter containing pharmacy and pharmaceutical-related information, namely, books, fliers, brochures, manuals, guides, pamphlets and trade journals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Custom design for others of personal digital assistant software programs for use by a pharmacist or pharmacy technician in the practice of pharmacy, not including Internet access software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by APOTEX INC
- Other trademarks owned by APOTEX TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by APOTEX TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named IPHARMACIST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |