USPTO serial 76449803
UNISEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNISEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Halifax, Nova Scotia, CA
Oakville, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
the firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, MICHAEL F. CLAYTON, JAMES R. SIMS III, RON N. DREBEN, KAREN A. BUTCHER, BRETT I. MILLER, ANITA B. POLOTT , CAROLE R. KLEIN, ALBERT G. TRAMPOSCH, MEREDITH A. CARLO, JOSEPH E. WASHINGTON, ASHLEY A. PHILLIPS, HENRY SH
TMSU JEFFREY H GREENE & KRISTIN H ALTOFFMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | operation of telephone call centers for others; management of telephone call centers for others; shareholder record keeping services; accounting services; mutual fund record keeping services; investor record keeping services; bookkeeping for electronic funds transfer | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Transfer agency services rendered to issuers of investment securities; investment fund transfer and transaction services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |