Drawing for Serial No. 76449954

USPTO serial 76449954

Serial No. 76449954

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3066297Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 7, 2006
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with Serial No. 76449954?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Becker

Jeffrey M. Becker Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700Dallas, TX 75219-7673UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Laboratory robots for use in the field of nanotechnology; mechanisms for grasping, rotating, moving and assembling nanotechnology components; microscale assemblers; nanoscale assemblers; macroscale assemblers; nanotechnology research tools and nanotechnology equipment and attachments to same for manipulation and/or characterization of nanotechnology materials, namely, grippers, clamps, nanomechanical probes, probes, actuators and related attachments for microscopes, and nanomanipulators; microassembly systems comprised of mechanisms for grasping, rotating, moving and assembling microscale components for microelectromechanical systems fabricationSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 13, 2000
042Design and testing of new products for other; licensing of intellectual property; development of new technology for others in the field of nanotechnologySECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 17, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 30, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 24, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 25, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 17, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 14, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 22, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 22, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 29, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 23, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 15, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance