Drawing for MVP

USPTO serial 76450315

MVP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2823956Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 16, 2004
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MVP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerome Politzer

Jerome Politzer Horan Lloyd A Professional Corporation26385 Carmel Rancho Boulevard, Suite 200Carmel, CA 93923UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031fresh fruits and vegetablesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMar 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2015CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2015COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2013C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Aug 9, 2013C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Aug 9, 2013ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 18, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
May 13, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 16, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 29, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 13, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance