USPTO serial 76451087
INTERSEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERSEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Brooke
THOMAS W BROOKE HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPSTE 1002099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Non-metal fasteners for closing packaging, cargo containers, bags and barrels, namely, slide fasteners, snap fasteners, bag closures, and container closures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |