USPTO serial 76451226
LIGHTSAVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHTSAVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELVIN K. SILVERMAN, ESQ.
MELVIN K SILVERMAN ESQ MELVIN K SILVERMAN & ASSOCS PC500 W CYPRESS CREEK RD STE 500FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Protective systems for airport runway and taxiway light fixtures, namely, anchored rubber mats | ABANDONED | May 8, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |