USPTO serial 76451325
E LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3069456Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2006
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with E LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven E. Dicke
STEVEN E DICKE DICKE, BILLIG & CZAJA PLLC100 S FIFTH ST STE 2250FIFTH ST TWRSMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | on-line delivery of publications, namely newspapers magazines, and newsletters featuring information in the filed of business via a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 9, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |