Drawing for BOYCE COMPETITION PROVEN RACING EQUIPMENT

USPTO serial 76452018

BOYCE COMPETITION PROVEN RACING EQUIPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAIRD, MICHAEL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BOYCE COMPETITION PROVEN RACING EQUIPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam W. Johnson

ADAM W JOHNSON MELTZER, PURTILL & STELLE LLC1515 E WOODFIELD RD SECOND FLSCHAUMBURG, IL 60173UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007HIGH PERFORMANCE AUTOMOBILE RACING EXHAUST SYSTEMS COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF HEADERS, EXHAUST MANIFOLD, EXHAUST PIPES, AND MUFFLERSABANDONED—
012HIGH PERFORMANCE AUTOMOBILE RACING CHASSIS COMPONENTS AND SUB-FRAMES, NAMELY FRAME RAILS, STABILIZER BARS, CROSSMEMBERS, TRAILING ARMS, AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREOFABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 8, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 8, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 8, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 28, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 28, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 6, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance