Drawing for CHIAVE

USPTO serial 76452278

CHIAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dax Alvarez

DAX ALVAREZ BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Food supplements, namely, dietary, nutritional, vitamin, and mineral supplementsACTIVE—
029Cheese and cracker combinations; processed edible sunflower seeds; processed nuts; snack food dips; potato based snack foods, namely, potato chips and potato crispsACTIVE—
030Processed, un-popped popcorn, microwave popcorn, corn based snack foods, namely, corn chips and tortilla chips; crackers; grain based snack food bars; granola based snack food bars; multi-grain snack chips; popped popcorn; candy coated popped popcorn; popped popcorn based snack food bars; pretzels; puffed corn based snacks, namely, cheese flavored popcorn snacks; rice based snack food bars; salsas; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, and processed nuts; candy; candy bars; candy mintsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 4, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 30, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance