Drawing for BABY SHAKESPEARE

USPTO serial 76452607

BABY SHAKESPEARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY SHAKESPEARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven Plotkin

Steven Plotkin The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetCorporate Legal- Trademark DepartmentBurbank, CA 91521-0643

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Address books; photograph albums; appliques in the form of decals; appointment books; arts and craft paint kits; autograph books; baby books; paper party bags; ball-point pens; binders; bookends; bookmarks; books, magazines and periodicals featuring artwork, stories, games and activities for children; paper gift wrap bows; paper cake decorations; calendars; flash cards; gift cards; greeting cards; cartoons; pen and pencil cases; decorative paper centerpieces; chalk; children's activity books; modeling clay; paper table cloths; coloring books; paper party decorations; diaries; gift wrapping paper; paper party hats; paper napkins; pens; pencils; stickers; posters; notebooks; memo pads; erasers; pencil sharpeners; writing paper; envelopes; paper weights; paper coasters; paper mats; postcardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 15, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 15, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 29, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 11, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 24, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 8, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 21, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 6, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2008TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 3, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 19, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance