USPTO serial 76452641
POLY-PRO PLUS (P3)
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLY-PRO PLUS (P3)?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | RIGID PLASTIC SHEETS FOR USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF REST ROOMS, DRESSING ROOMS AND OFFICES | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |