USPTO serial 76452687
AQUAMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AQUAMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
32602 Vlotho, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard M. Goldberg
RICHARD M GOLDBERG25 E SALEM STSTE 419HACKENSACK, NJ 07601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | SEWAGE PLANTS AND THEIR PARTS, NAMELY, INSTALLATIONS FOR WASTE SEWAGE TREATMENT, NAMELY, TREATMENT TANKS AND TREATMENT UNITS INCLUDING AERATION PUMPS, SEWAGE PUMPS AND CLEAR WATER PUMPS; FERMENTATION INSTALLATIONS FOR BIOLOGICAL SEWAGE PURIFICATION AND FOR TREATING SEWAGE, NAMELY, FILTERING UNITS FOR FERMENTING, PURIFYING AND TREATING SEWAGE, AERATION PUMPS AND AGITATORS; PURIFIERS FOR SEWAGE; SETTLER APPARATUS FOR SEWAGE IN THE NATURE OF A TANK WHERE WASTE WATER IS GATHERED SO THAT SEWAGE MAY SETTLE; TRANSPORTABLE APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR PROCESSING SEWAGE, NAMELY, CARRIERS CARRYING AGITATORS, SEWAGE PUMPS, CLEAR WATER PUMPS AND AERATORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |