USPTO serial 76452689
SOYCHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3104310Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2006
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOYCHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ace Canning Corporation Sdn. Bhd
Selangor Darul Ehsan, MY
Ace Canning Corporation Sdn. Bhd
Selangor Darul Ehsan, MY
Ace Canning Corporation Sdn. Bhd
Selangor Darul Ehsan, MY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley R. Moore
STANLEY R MOORE JENKENS & GILCHRIST1445 ROSS AVE STE 3200DALLAS, TX 75202-2799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer, ale, porter; mineral and aerated waters; fruit Juices; soft drinks; carbonated and non-carbonated non-alcoholic drinks, namely, colas, fruit flavored soft drinks, fruit juice concentrates, aerated fruit juices, fruit nectars, fruit punch, pop, soft drink; concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ace Canning Corporation Sdn. Bhd
- Other trademarks owned by Ace Canning Corporation Sdn. Bhd
- Other trademarks owned by Ace Canning Corporation Sdn. Bhd
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SOYCHOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 2, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | NAUD | SU - NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |