USPTO serial 76452746
LITTLE EINSTEIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITTLE EINSTEIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mei-Lan Stark
MEI-LAN STARK THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0633UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | RUBBER BALLS; ACTION SKILL GAMES; BEAN BAG DOLLS; PLUSH TOYS; BALLOONS; BATH TOYS; CHRISTMAS TREE ORNAMENTS; BOARD GAMES; BUILDING BLOCKS; EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING CARD GAMES; PLAYING CARDS; DOLLS AND DOLL CLOTHING; DOLL PLAYSETS; CRIB TOYS; ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS; MANIPULATIVE GAMES; JIGSAW PUZZLES; KITES; MOBILES; MUSIC BOX TOYS; PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS; INFLATABLE POOL TOYS; MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; WIND-UP TOYS; TARGET GAMES; TOY VEHICLES; TOY CARS; TOY TRUCKS; TOY BUCKET AND SHOVEL SETS; ROLLER SKATES; TOY MODEL KITS; MUSICAL TOYS; BUBBLE MAKING WANDS AND SOLUTION SETS; TOY FIGURINES; TOY BANKS; PUPPETS; SKATEBOARDS; SCOOTERS; FACE MASKS; HAND-HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |