USPTO serial 76453540
CONSCIOUS CUISINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2777602Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 28, 2003
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONSCIOUS CUISINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oro Valley, AZ
Oro Valley, AZ
Oro Valley, AZ
Oro Valley, AZ
Oro Valley, AZ
Oro Valley, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ellen W. Stiefler
Ellen W. Stiefler STIEFLER LAW GROUP, PC3525 DEL MAR HEIGHTS RD., #111SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2122UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing training and instructional courses in the field of healthy, low fat, low calorie food selection and preparation and consulting services related thereto rendered to resorts and restaurants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1997 |
| 043 | providing consulting services, rendered to resorts and restaurants, in the fields of healthy selection and healthy preparation of low fat, low calorie foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Neff, Patricia
- Other trademarks owned by Neff, Patricia
- Other trademarks owned by Neff, Patricia
- Other trademarks owned by Neff, Cary E.
- Other trademarks owned by Neff, Cary E.
- Other trademarks owned by Neff, Cary E.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named CONSCIOUS CUISINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |