USPTO serial 76453963
DIRT CHEAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIRT CHEAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Whitaker Rayner
W WHITAKER RAYNER WATKINS LUDLAM WINTER & STENNIS, PA633 N STATE ST 39202POST OFFICE BOX 427JACKSON, MS 39205-0427Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail department store services, specifically excluding the sale of beer, liquor and cigarettes | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |