USPTO serial 76454018
PHOENIX ELECTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHOENIX ELECTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES E. BAXLEY
CHARLES E BAXLEY HART, BAXLEY, DANIELS & HOLTON90 JOHN ST STE 309NEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical and electronic components, namely, sound amplifiers, computer interface boards, circuit breakers, computer buffers, fiber optic cables, magnetic coded card readers, computer chips, silicon chips, chronographs for use as specialized time recording apparatuses, coaxial cables, electric coils, computer disks sold blank, computer memories, computer monitors, computer utility programs, condensers, electrical conductors, electrical conduits, fiber optic light and image conduits, electrical connectors, electrical controllers, electrical converters, covers for electrical outlets, de-magnetizers for magnetic tapes, automatic telephone dialers, light emitting diodes, electric luminescent display panels, electric switch plates, electro- mechanical controls for use in manufacture, emergency warning lights, electronic encryption units, insulated electrical conductors, integrated circuits, interface boards, laser scanners for industrial inspection, lasers for measuring purposes, lasers not for medical purposes, electric locks, magnets, metal detectors, micro-computers, mini-computers, electronic motion sensing switches, multiplexers, ohmmeters, computer operating systems, optical character recognition apparatuses,optical inspection apparatuses for industrial use, optical lense sights, optical scanners, oscilloscopes, particle accelerators, X-Y plotters, electrical power supplies, pressure gauges, dot matrix printers, satellite processors, salinometers, silicon wafers, sirens, electric sockets, solenoid valves, sonar, super computers, super mini-computers, electric switches, electronic motion sensitive switches, electronic touch sensitive switches, tachometers, computer terminals, transceivers, electrical transformers,voltage surge protectors, voltage surge suppressors, volt meters and electrical wires all sold to original equipment manufacturers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design for others in the field of electrical engineering and electronics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |