USPTO serial 76454055
ULTIMATE FEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTIMATE FEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bingham Farms, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell M. Musial, II
MITCHELL M MUSIAL II MITCHELL M MUSIAL II PLLC6960 ABBOTT TERWEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48323UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Shoe supports, shoe cushions, arch supports and foot orthotics for boots or shoes; custom shoe supports, custom shoe cushions, custom arch supports and custom foot orthotics for boots or shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of shoe supports, shoe cushions, arch supports and foot orthotics; retail store services in the field of custom shoe supports, custom shoe cushions, custom arch supports and custom foot orthotics; distributorships in the field of shoe supports, custom shoe supports, shoe cushions, custom shoe cushions, arch supports, custom arch supports, foot orthotics and custom foot orthotics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |