USPTO serial 76454397
EMSYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMSYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randal J. Brotherhood
RANDAL J BROTHERHOOD MEISSNER TIERNEY FISHER & NICHOLS SC111 E KILBOURN AVE 19TH FLMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6622UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Collection, organization, integration, analysis and reporting of emergency medical information as it relates to availability of emergency medical resources on a web-based, inter-linked basis, by and between hospitals and other emergency medical health care or service providers, emergency government agencies, public health agencies and law enforcement agencies to facilitate optimal access to and use of emergency medical resources; collection, organization, integration, analysis and reporting of emergency medical patient symptom, triage and other patient encounter data for use, on a web-based, inter-linked basis, by and between hospitals and other emergency medical health care or services providers, emergency government agencies, public health agencies and law enforcement agencies for health and safety purposes, early-warning syndromatic surveillance and prompt detection and response to chemical or biological terrorism | ACTIVE | Feb 14, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |