USPTO serial 76454554
TOGETHER FOREVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOGETHER FOREVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North York, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas S. Johnson
DOUGLAS S JOHNSON DENNISON ASSOCIATES133 RICHMOND ST W STE 301TORONTO, ON M5H 2L7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | china and glassware namely, tea cups, coffee cups and drinking mugs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |