USPTO serial 76454652
THE TETHER TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 2, 2004
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE TETHER TECHNOLOGY COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Forestville, CA
Forestville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHARON R. SMITH
SHARON R. SMITH MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1 Market Street, Spear Street TowerSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | anti-tangle animal tether posts and attachable tethers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 16, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |