Drawing for HAMMERHEAD

USPTO serial 76454710

HAMMERHEAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3197064Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 9, 2007
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAMMERHEAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle D. Kahn

HAMMERHEAD SYSTEMS INC640 CLYDE COURTMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Networking hardware, namely, a wide-area edge switch for use in the field of data communications; systems software for database management for use in the field of data communicationsSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 10, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2011C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Nov 10, 2011CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 27, 2011CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
May 27, 2011PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 30, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 20, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Nov 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 27, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 2, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance