USPTO serial 76454750
EMBRAER 175
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMBRAER 175?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell H. Stabbe
MITCHELL H. STABBE DOW, LOHNES & ALBERTSON, PLLC1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE, N.W.SUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | aircraft engines and structural parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |