USPTO serial 76454904
MGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redmond, WA
Redmond, WA
REDMOND, WA
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
REDMOND, WA
Other trademarks owned by NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless telecommunications platform software; communications software for connecting users to telecommunication networks; communications software for connecting wireless devices; software for the electronic transmission of data; software for the activation and operation of telephone calling cards; software for the activation, billing and operation of wireless telecommunications services; software for the implementation, configuration and management of wireless networks; wireless telephones; handheld computers; wireless data transceivers; digital cameras; digital audio recorders and players; digital video recorders and players | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CINGULAR WIRELESS II, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MGEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 25, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |