Drawing for S SAMMY GROUP

USPTO serial 76455018

S SAMMY GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S SAMMY GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Grow

MICHAEL A GROW ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer software design and maintenance for others; computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; designing of amusement machines, namely, pachinko machines, slot machines, arcade game machines and other amusement machines; technical research in the field of amusement machines including pachinko machines, slot machines, arcade game machines and other amusement machines; computer programming; computer software designing and updating; services relating to licensing contracts based on portrait rights and using stage names for public entertainers, agencies on liaison services relating to copyrights, photography, planning designs and photography; preparation and maintenance of computer programs relating to copyrights; design and implementation of homepages on the Internet, and/or on computer networks for construction or management; technical research and analysis relating to computers and web pages; consultancy in the field of computer hardware, including amusement machines; consultancy in the field of construction of entertainment and recreational facilities; technology research; product research and development for others; research of technology projects; analyzing computer systems; rental of computers, namely, central processing units; programmed data carrying electronic circuits, magnetic disks, magnetic tapes, optical magnetic disks, CD-ROMs and peripheral equipment for computersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 3, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Jan 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance