USPTO serial 76455155
LAUNCH PAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAUNCH PAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rottenburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Apparatus for transport on land, in the air and on the water, namely, automobiles, boats, trailers, trains, and karts, namely, motorized go-karts | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, blouses, shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, tops, bustiers, trousers, skirts, sets, suits, coats, underwear; swimwear; shawls; neckerchieves; headbands; jogging and fitness clothing; gloves; belts; ties; headwear; and shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Technical apparatus for amusement purposes, namely, trampolines, bungy-trampolins, climbing walls, roller coasters; sports articles, namely, elastic bands as parts for the aforesaid goods, and bobs from bobsled | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Organizing exhibitions for Amusement Rides, Theme Parks, Family Entertainment Centers; and sporting and cultural activities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Raidt, Peter
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LAUNCH PAD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |