Drawing for RESCYOU

USPTO serial 76455165

RESCYOU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESCYOU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald N. Huff

Donald N. Huff DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLCTHIRD FL W1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025SHOES, BEACH SHOES, BOOTS, SKI BOOTS, PANTS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, HATS, BATHING SUITS, CAPS, FISHING VESTS, GLOVES, OVERALLS, PULLOVERS, SWEAT ABSORBENT UNDERWEAR, UNDERWEAR, WAISTCOATS, WATERPROOF JACKETS AND PANTS, WET SUITS FOR WATER SKIINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 30, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 30, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 12, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 11, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 22, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 22, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 8, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 31, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 8, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 18, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 14, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 18, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 17, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance