Drawing for INERSAN

USPTO serial 76455191

INERSAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INERSAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donna J. Bunton

DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC11TH FL901 N GLEBE RDARLINGTON, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES OF THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM, GYNECOLOGICAL DISEASES AND SKIN DISEASES; MEDICAL HYGIENIC PREPARATIONS FOR WOMAN'S INTIMATE HYGIENE, NAMELY, MEDICATED VAGINAL COMPRESSES AND DOUCHES; DIETETIC SUBSTANCES, NAMELY, FOODS FOR PERSONS ON MEDICALLY RESTRICTED DIETS ADAPTED FOR MEDICAL USE; FOOD FOR BABIES; NUTRACEUTICALS FOR THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES OF THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM, GYNECOLOGICAL DISEASES AND SKIN DISEASES; AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 29, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 29, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 26, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 5, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance