USPTO serial 76455200
LIQUID VIDEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3043163Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2006
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIQUID VIDEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HILLIARD, OH
CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC.
WESTMINSTER, CO
Other trademarks owned by CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC.
CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC.
WESTMINSTER, CO
Other trademarks owned by CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC.
CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC.
WESTMINSTER, CO
Other trademarks owned by CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC.
Wan Chai, HK
HUNG HOM, KOWLOON, HK
HILLIARD, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew F. Johnston
Melanie C. Holloway McGuireWoods LLPOne James Center, 901 East Cary StreetRichmond, VA 23219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video display devices, namely-- Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs), Liquid Crystal Displays (LCDs), and Plasma Flat Panel displays | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 14, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRO ELECTRONICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CIRCUIT CITY STORES WEST COAST, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Enity Technology, Limited
- Other trademarks owned by ISL GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MICRO ELECTRONICS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LIQUID VIDEO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |