USPTO serial 76455366
Serial No. 76455366
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76455366?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Simon Lemay
SIMON LEMAY LAVERY, DE BILLY925 CHEMIN SAINT-LOUIS STE 500QUEBEC, QC G1S 1C1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Specialized ingredients to be used in the dietary, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical and cosmetics fields, namely-- hydrolysates, peptides and micro-particle manufactured from the treatment of dietary proteins (milk, fish, egg, soya);products for special dietetic use, namely-- powder blend or liquid blend enriched with proteins to be used as a meal substitute ; dietary substitute enriched with proteins, vitamins and minerals; nutritional supplements ; foods sold by weight-loss clinics, drug stores and health professionals, namely-- bars, cookies, ready-to-serve drinks, puddings, consommes, soups, hot chocolate, egg custard, omelets, porridge, salad dressings, fruit juice base, vegetable juice base and tomato juice base | ACTIVE | Nov 19, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |