USPTO serial 76455462
S.E.E. SOFTWARE.ELECTRICITY.ENGINEERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 25, 2006
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with S.E.E. SOFTWARE.ELECTRICITY.ENGINEERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
INFORMATIQUE GRAPHISME ENERGETIQUE - I.G.E.
31770 Colomiers, FR
Other trademarks owned by INFORMATIQUE GRAPHISME ENERGETIQUE - I.G.E.
INFORMATIQUE GRAPHISME ENERGETIQUE - I.G.E.
31770 Colomiers, FR
Other trademarks owned by INFORMATIQUE GRAPHISME ENERGETIQUE - I.G.E.
INFORMATIQUE GRAPHISME ENERGETIQUE - I.G.E.
31770 Colomiers, FR
Other trademarks owned by INFORMATIQUE GRAPHISME ENERGETIQUE - I.G.E.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet G. Ricciuti
Janet G. Ricciuti JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI, PC3735 CONCORD ROADDOYLESTOWN, PA 18902UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INFORMATIQUE GRAPHISME ENERGETIQUE - I.G.E.
- Other trademarks owned by INFORMATIQUE GRAPHISME ENERGETIQUE - I.G.E.
- Other trademarks owned by INFORMATIQUE GRAPHISME ENERGETIQUE - I.G.E.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named S.E.E. SOFTWARE.ELECTRICITY.ENGINEERING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 25, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |