USPTO serial 76455821
COMPLETE TANNING SOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2004
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPLETE TANNING SOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI
FARMINGTON HILLS, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa K. Mack
LISA K MACK DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC39577 WOODWARD AVE STE 300BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5086UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIPS IN THE FIELD OF TANNING EQUIPMENT, LOTIONS, LAMPS, TANNING SUPPLIES AND ACCESSORIES; BUSINESS CONSULTATION TO SPAS AND SALONS; MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING TANNING EQUIPMENT, LOTIONS, LAMPS, TANNING SUPPLIES AND ACCESSORIES BOTH IN PRINT AND VIA THE INTERNET | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |