Drawing for BLUELINK

USPTO serial 76455874

BLUELINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUELINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael P. Martin

MICHAEL P MARTIN YANNY & SMITH1801 CENTURY PARK E 23RD FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, shorts, pants, jackets, hats, and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 28, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 15, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 26, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 9, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 11, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance