Drawing for MEYER VINEYARD

USPTO serial 76456360

MEYER VINEYARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2799507Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 23, 2003
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEYER VINEYARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL RIVIERA

Scott W. Petersen Holland & Knight LLP131 Dearborn Street30th floorChicago, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WINESECTION 18 - CANCELLEDAug 1, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2008C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Jun 18, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 31, 2005PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 23, 2003R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 31, 2003CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 29, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 16, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2003EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance