Drawing for RYLEE

USPTO serial 76456520

RYLEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEORGE, DAHLIA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RYLEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.

EDWARD D LANQUIST JR WADDEY & PATTERSON414 UNION ST STE 2020BANK OF AMERICA PLZNASHVILLE, TN 37219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025ShoesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 28, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 28, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 20, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 12, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Oct 12, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 2, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 5, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance