Drawing for EVERSUN SE

USPTO serial 76456538

EVERSUN SE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EVERSUN SE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Slattery

JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers, PC monitors, point of sales monitors, point of sales liquid crystal display, point of sales bare bones comprised of PC-based host computer, keyboard, display, dedicated operating system, cash drawer, and printer; point of sales all-in-one comprised of PC-based host computer, keyboard, display, dedicated operating system, cash drawer, printer, barcode reader, card reader, and scanner; industrial personal computer display; closed circuit television comprised of video cameras, housing for video cameras, assemblies for video cameras, and mounting bases for video cameras; closed circuit television monitors; closed circuit television liquid crystal display; circuit television cameras; calculators, cash registers; digital video recorders, comprised of digital signal processor, hard disk drive, embedded operating system, interfaces for cameras, monitors, sensors, and networks; image processors, namely, scanners, digital cameras, digital camcorders, and projectors; digital video storage device, namely, hard disk drives, CD read-write drives, CD re-writeable drives, DVD read-write drives, and DVD re-writeable drivesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 12, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 12, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 12, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 25, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 15, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 16, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance